# (5)Dragon Age: Origins vs (4)The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess 2010

_source: (5)Dragon Age: Origins vs (4)The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess 2010 (revid 69223)_

## Results

**Round 2**

Saturday, November 27, 2010

## Ulti's Analysis

- **Division:** Southeast
- **Match \#:** 78
- **Match Date:** Saturday, November 27, 2010
- **Vote difference:** 19,918
- **Oracle Expectations:** The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess - 64.95% 102 for - 0 against
- **GameFAQs Prediction:** The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess - 68.26%
- **Battle Contest Predictions:** Banked: 429 Dragon Age: Origins: 3297 The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess: 11369

Not even the casuals got tricked by the weird seeding in this division, as even they favored Zelda more heavily than any other game to make it out of the division. This was also the fourth match in a row where the picture was better than the match, so people were getting super bored at this point and needed something good to happen soon. The next match would bring that, kind of.

Worth noting here is Dragon Age got kind of screwed in bracket placement with all these western games causing damage. Fallout 3, Half-Life 2, Oblivion and others all did some things this contest, while Dragon Age was stuck facing the biggest Zelda of the Gamecube-Wii era in round 2. Not every game can get good bracket favor, naturally, but it really feels like Dragon Age could have done good things in a different place on such an RPG-heavy web site.

People also looked at this and claimed our 2009 GOTY polls were terrible, but it's Zelda. You don't F with Zelda 1 on 1. Besides, we had a much funnier flagship for LOL 2009 than Dragon Age.

## Match Trends

## External Links

- [Match Updates](http://www.gamefaqscontests.com/drupal/node/22?matchnum=4146&num=2)
- [Oracle Match Results](http://www.oraclechallenge.com/archives.php?contest=SC2k10&type=match&match=78)

• **Previous Match**       • **Next Match**
