# (4)Cloud Strife vs (7)Mario (Losers Bracket) 2018 _source: (4)Cloud Strife vs (7)Mario (Losers Bracket) 2018 (revid 88601)_ ## Ulti's Analysis If you want to know how a grownup acts, XIII is cool is a fantastic example. This match cost him the guru contest, and he didn't act a fool about it. Major props to that guy. As for the match, this was an incredible experience, and it was so nice to finally get this damn rematch from 2002 that we've all been asking for for 16 years. The only match in higher demand at this point is Mario vs Sonic. A lot can change in 16 years, and there was a long time there where Cloud felt leagues stronger than Mario. We all wanted him to get the rematch and potentially get revenge for 2002. Then the years kept going, Cloud kept getting weaker, and we all slowly realized that Cloud's shot for redemption was probably done. I know there were some 4ways and battle royales in there, but it's just not the same as 1v1. By the time we actually got this rematch, we all assumed Mario would auto-win. Sound like a familiar theme? I know the stakes here in 2018 don't mean as much, but it was still fun to watch. It was practically an exact reversal of what happened trend-wise in 2002, too. In that match, Cloud built up a 1000 vote lead overnight. Then a combination of the morning vote, rallying from Planet Gamecube, 500 stuffed proxy votes, and Super Mario Sunshine launching on the day of the match all converged on Cloud all within 12 hours of each other. Mario got a lead of 200 votes heading into the evening, and he just inexplicably never let up. Now unlike most people you'll see talking about how great that match was and how great that contest was, I was actually there and remember it all. The three day time frame we had in 2002 with Samus \> Sonic, Sephiroth \> Mega Man, and Mario \> Cloud will absolutely never be topped. There was meltdown after meltdown after meltdown, with Samus coming back from 1500 down in the final three hours, Sephiroth coming back from 700 down, and the insanity of that Mario/Cloud match. By the time that Mario/Cloud match was over, the board had over 200 pages of topics at 50 per page, with over half coming from Mario and Cloud's duel. As I write this, Board 8 doesn't even have 4 full pages of topics. There is no comparison here. I've also been very consistent about rallying for 16 years, and you can check the 2002 writeup for proof. I've always supported it, even if something I'm rooting for loses. Cloud losing that match sucked, especially when there were clearly 500 cheated votes, but I've never been mad at Planet Gamecube about it. Fast forward 16 years. We're all in our 30s now and don't care nearly as much, but this was still a long time coming,. Especially with how Mario lost. This dude built up a 300 vote lead heading into the night vote. After some stalling, Square's old night vote supremacy kicked in and Cloud mounted a comeback overnight. But he didn't quite finish the job, and Mario started going up with the morning vote again. Right about here, it kind of hit me. We keep assuming Mario has this auto-win button, but this dude functions better when he's barely losing instead of barely winning. He's basically rubberband AI in a racing game at this point. His best play is to stay barely behind all match, then clutch up at the end. Dude is an awful frontrunner sometimes, and we saw it here. He only got his lead up to 200 with the morning vote, and coughed most of that up by lunch. By the time the kids got home from school, Cloud had already tied this thing up. One would assume the ASV would help Mario out, but it was somehow and someway Cloud that went up. Right in the face of all that history and that FF7 erosion and all that Mario clutch gene and whatever else, Cloud looked Death himself right in the face and said not today. Remember that insane Mario hold of a 200 vote lead in 2002? I do. Well in 2018, Cloud decided it was his turn to hold serve. Not only that, but as the poll was getting close to finishing up he did what Samus failed to do -- beat Mario's ass. There was no sitting back. In the final 30 minutes, Cloud made sure to go out there and layeth the smacketh down. Even then, people were terrified Mario would just erase a 150 vote lead in the final update. Nope. Cloud wins by 141 votes. I could come up with a myriad of reasons why Cloud pulled this thing off, but I'm pretty sure one reason stands out above all the others. The funniest thing about this, and I'll get more into this with the final match, is that Square has been actively trying to sabotage Cloud being in Smash and it hasn't mattered. He has absolutely gotten new strength from that series, he's retained popularity despite Square's bullshit (https://www.eventhubs.com/stats/ssbu/), and it showed in this match. No chance in hell he pulls this off otherwise. Good run by Mario this year, but it ended one round before he wanted. That's what happens when you keep failing to put people away. Eventually one just bites you. This doesn't erase the pain of the 2002 match by any means, but it was a pretty decent revenge nonetheless. Kind of like every now and again you get a Super Bowl rematch in the following regular season and the losing team wins. It doesn't mean as much, but it's something. That's effectively what this was. Nice job by Cloud, even if he had to get into Smash to do it. Remember back when Square could actually beat Nintendo now and again on this site instead of having every single debated match between the two companies be an auto-loss for Square? Isn't this nice? Granted Square had to bend the knee, but so what? This was awesome! Addendum from Kanz: What's interesting is I'm pretty sure if Cloud and Mario meet up without Mario having beaten Samus twice, once while having to expend the clutch, Mario wins here. No proof of it of course, but it felt like there was a very strong anti-Mario sentiment that probably cost him a few votes. Fantastic point and probably true, but who really knows. I will say that pretty much no one on Board 8 was rooting for Mario to pull this off, and there was some extra oomph behind that late Cloud push. It's like people realized they fucked up by not pushing for Samus harder and just wanted to finish Mario off when they had the chance again. Kanz's point here is very fair! ## Safer777's Analysis This result I didn't expected. Cloud has fallen from the early contests and Mario has constantly new games. Plus Odyssey came last year and it is considered perhaps the best Mario game. Plus the new Smash game is out. So I thought that Mario would win with at least 53% here. But Cloud did it! These 2 have fought in the first ever contest where Mario won because he had a HUGE rally(big for how things were back then of course) and a new Mario game the same day that they fought! And he barely won back there too! Also he beat Crono in a controversial match too and from back then he became the villain of the contest. The contest only, not in games obviously. But after he beat Samus 2 times in this contest and in the 2nd time with the last update it seems most people wanted him to lose from the board at least. And he did lose!  So for the actual match. Mario was winning from the start of course. But Cloud was always right behind him. Mario lead was around 310 votes and then Cloud started  cutting but Mario begun gaining and his lead maxed out at 335. But Cloud started cutting and cutting but after a while Mario started gaining again. He is a fighter!  Then Cloud got serious and started cutting and eventually after almost 20 hours he went ahead and started pulling. Mario tried to cut, but the best he could do is stall. So eventually Cloud managed to won. Mario clutch didn't saved the day! So yeah Cloud took revenge after 16 years! I know his power comes from Smash now but I don't care. He still has it! I think there was a rally for Cloud too though, because he did much better with anonymous votes than the registered ones. Still nice to see someone non  Nintendo win you know. FF7 man! Still has power! If only we FF 7 remake, or KH 3! If the FF 7 cast is in there at least. Still this match was really good no matter how you look at it. Also I believe almost the whole board had Mario winning here of course. Hey we can't predict everything. ## Tsunami's Analysis Well I guess we have our answer as to why Mario was ahead of Zelda in the adjusted X-Stats. The raw X-Stats may clearly use the Legends' Bracket numbers, but if the adjusted X-Stats were basing things off of the Losers' Bracket, Mario did put up a better performance against Cloud than Zelda would the following match. After Cloud held a narrow 250-247 lead at the freeze, Mario took the second update by 66 votes and proceeded to extend his lead past 300 within the first three hours of the match, peaking it at 335 about 7-1/2 hours in. Cloud would fight back over the remainder of the night, getting it down below 50 around 6 AM, but Mario rode the morning vote to a lead of over 200 before Cloud started fighting back again. Cloud took his first lead of the match with 4 hours and 35 minutes remaining, and the next update only increased his lead by a single vote before Mario took the next update--only by 5 votes, but that was enough for another lead change. But Cloud won the next update by 21 to take the lead for good, and the two battled for a bit, Cloud only taking a double-digit lead for the first time in the final hour. It was the \#8 closest 1v1 wire-to-wire match, \#6 among 24-hour matches...and yet, only \#5 for this contest! It meant that over half of the Top 10 came from this contest, except they already did because the match that it booted down to \#11 was also from this contest. Seriously, the all-time \#17 (again, for 1v1 matches only, since we keep the 3/4ways in a separate list) can't even make the contest's Top Ten. Maybe it's the registered voter bonus making things tighter than they should be, or maybe it's just the lowered vote totals, but this contest had a lot of really close matches, strictly speaking. Not all of them *felt* close. Here, let me give you a rundown of the overall top 25, except instead of listing the actual match, I'll just list what contest they're from: Asterisks are 12-hour matches. 1. GotD\* 2. CBIX\* 3. CBX 4. GotD\* 5. CBX 6. CBX 7. CBIX\* 8. BGE3 9. CBIX\* 10. CBX 11. CBX (that'd be this match) 12. CBX 13. GotD\* 14. CBIX\* 15. BGE2 16. CBX 17. CBIX\* 18. CBIII 19. CBX 20. CBVIII\* 21. CBIX\* 22. CBX 23. CBVII 24. CBIX\* 25. GotD\* 9 out of 25 from this contest. Even CBIX, which had similarly rancid vote totals whenever Draven was absent and had matches that ran only half as long, only had 7. Overall, 24-hour matches do now hold a 13-12 lead over 12-hour matches in the all-time top 25. I wonder what the upcoming Game of the Decade will look like. Will it break the records set here? And if it does, will it be because of intensity, or because of complete and utter apathy? I look at Minecraft, a casual game to end all casual games, and yet I have to take it to win *easily* in Round 1 because it's up against a MOBA and we absolutely abhor those after 2013. I look at Yakuza 0 getting its characters absolutely slaughtered in this contest and take it to Round 2 because it's up against something called The Witness. Overwatch seems like it'd fall squarely in the category of "things Board 8 hates, and is possibly slightly scared of the rally potential of", but iirc Death Stranding was considered a massive disappointment by all of those eagerly awaiting Kojima's next masterpiece after Konami kicked him to the curb and so I have to side with the casualbait. Except then you hop on over to the latest extruded Blizzard cash-extracting device and you're like "no, fuck that, I'm going with 'niche things that Board 8 loves'." I mean yeah it's probably still the wrong pick but it's a 7-10 match so eh, it's only worth one point. Though frankly the biggest problem is that all of these new games have generic "edgy" names. I initially had Bloodborne-CoD:BO as one of those "why do I have to pick one of these to win a match; they're both going to be megafodder" matches. But Bloodborne was actually respectable in BGE3, going up against a Final Fantasy game no less (not that I really trust recent Final Fantasy games to not be fodder either. Square spent most of the decade pushing Final Fantasy XIII sequels on us, and we responded by not putting *any* of the FFXIII games, not even the original one, in the bracket. And yes it was eligible; we were going by NA release dates unless no such date existed and Lightning rather famously appeared in a Winter 2010 Contest match before her game had released in the US. Not surprisingly, it was the strongest she'd ever look). The game that I was thinking of that got eviscerated was called "Hearthstone". Meanwhile, that same theory of "wait, this has actually been in a contest before" got me second-guessing taking Stardew Valley over Destiny, except Destiny actually did get blown out by something GameFAQs hates.